Most of commiters already knows that by heart and also dim already
have this warning. So maybe this is just Bart writing to blackboard. Duh!
Anyway for my own usage this tripe check will help for sure.
Maybe it help someone else in the future.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
dim | 4 ++++
drm-intel.rst | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dim b/dim
index eec5e43..73f6212 100755
--- a/dim
+++ b/dim
@@ -933,6 +933,10 @@ function checkpatch_commit
echo -e "The following files are outside of i915
maintenance scope:\n"
echo "$non_i915_files"
echo -e "\nConfirm you have appropriate Acked-by and
Reviewed-by for above files."
+ local acked_by_airlie=$($cmd | grep "Acked-by: Dave
Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>")
+ if [ "$acked_by_airlie" == "" ]; then
+ echo -e "\nRemind that for drm you should have an
Acked-by from Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>"
+ fi
fi
fi
}
diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst
index 79db1cf..583a687 100644
--- a/drm-intel.rst
+++ b/drm-intel.rst
@@ -300,7 +300,9 @@ the right decisions, and for others to set their the
expectations right.
The short list:
-* Only push patches changing `drivers/gpu/drm/i915`.
+* Only push patches changing `drivers/gpu/drm/i915`. If dim mentioned that you
+ are touching files outside i915 stop and make sure that you have the proper
+ Acked-by. Specially for drm files an Acked-by from Dave Airlie is required.
* Only push patches to `drm-intel-next-queued` branch.
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
