On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> A quick test to exercise one module paramter that should disable a chunk
> of code usually run at startup and shutdown.

Going for test driven development, are we? The BAT test list is not the
place to add tests that will break. We should get tests to be added to
the list passing first.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist 
> b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index a6b56f35..f9beabe5 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -242,5 +242,6 @@ igt@vgem_basic@second-client
>  igt@vgem_basic@sysfs
>  igt@vgem_basic@unload
>  igt@drv_module_reload@basic-reload
> +igt@drv_module_reload@basic-no-display
>  igt@drv_module_reload@basic-reload-inject
>  igt@drv_module_reload@basic-reload-final

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to