On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:03:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Wait request is poorly named IMO. After working with these functions for > some time, I feel it's much clearer to name the functions more > appropriately. > > Of course we must update the callers to use the new name as well. > > This leaves room within our namespace for a *real* wait request function > at some point. > > Note to maintainer: this patch is optional. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <[email protected]> I've slurped in the entire series for -next, thanks for the patches. I'll look at the testcase some more over the w/e (I'll be a bit offline), I think we should pimp it with a few more cases.
Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
