On ma, 2017-02-06 at 09:51 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Handling the dynamic charp module parameter requires us to copy it for
> the error state, or remember to lock it when reading (in case it used
> with 0600).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

I'm bit hesitant that we merge known dead code here.

Maybe the guc firmware path override would be useful to excercise this?

Code itself;

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to