On Mon,  4 Jun 2012 18:39:19 +0200
Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:

> ... instead of abusing mode->clock by storing it in there - we
> shouldn't touch that one at all. This patch is the first prep step to
> constify the mode argument of the intel_dp_mode_fixup function.
> 
> The next patch will stop us from modifying mode->clock.
> 
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c      |   12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |    2 ++
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 9f5148ac..0161d94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4416,16 +4416,8 @@ static int ironlake_crtc_mode_set(struct drm_crtc 
> *crtc,
>       /* CPU eDP doesn't require FDI link, so just set DP M/N
>          according to current link config */
>       if (is_cpu_edp) {
> -             target_clock = mode->clock;
>               intel_edp_link_config(edp_encoder, &lane, &link_bw);
>       } else {
> -             /* [e]DP over FDI requires target mode clock
> -                instead of link clock */
> -             if (is_dp)
> -                     target_clock = mode->clock;
> -             else
> -                     target_clock = adjusted_mode->clock;
> -
>               /* FDI is a binary signal running at ~2.7GHz, encoding
>                * each output octet as 10 bits. The actual frequency
>                * is stored as a divider into a 100MHz clock, and the
> @@ -4436,6 +4428,14 @@ static int ironlake_crtc_mode_set(struct drm_crtc 
> *crtc,
>               link_bw = intel_fdi_link_freq(dev) * MHz(100)/KHz(1)/10;
>       }
>  
> +     /* [e]DP over FDI requires target mode clock instead of link clock. */
> +     if (edp_encoder)
> +             target_clock = intel_edp_target_clock(edp_encoder, mode);
> +     else if (is_dp)
> +             target_clock = mode->clock;
> +     else
> +             target_clock = adjusted_mode->clock;
> +
>       /* determine panel color depth */
>       temp = I915_READ(PIPECONF(pipe));
>       temp &= ~PIPE_BPC_MASK;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index ade98e0..ae7c623 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,18 @@ intel_edp_link_config(struct intel_encoder 
> *intel_encoder,
>               *link_bw = 270000;
>  }
>  
> +int
> +intel_edp_target_clock(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
> +                    struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> +     struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(intel_encoder, struct 
> intel_dp, base);
> +
> +     if (intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode)
> +             return intel_dp->panel_fixed_mode->clock;
> +     else
> +             return mode->clock;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 39d7b07..6a2ae30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -359,6 +359,8 @@ intel_dp_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct 
> drm_display_mode *mode,
>                struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode);
>  extern bool intel_dpd_is_edp(struct drm_device *dev);
>  extern void intel_edp_link_config(struct intel_encoder *, int *, int *);
> +extern int intel_edp_target_clock(struct intel_encoder *,
> +                               struct drm_display_mode *mode);
>  extern bool intel_encoder_is_pch_edp(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
>  extern int intel_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe);
>  extern void intel_flush_display_plane(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,

Yeah looks good, we'll need testing though.  This patch could change
the clock rate used on PCH attached eDP panels.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to