On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:05:53PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> Trying to have subject_verb_object ordering and more descriptive names,
> the intel_huc_init() and intel_guc_init() functions are renamed:
>
> * `intel_guc` is the subject, so those functions now take intel_guc
> structure, instead of the dev_priv
> * fetch is the verb
> * fw is the object which better describes the function's role
>
> Same change is done for the huc counterpart.
>
> Also we bulk call both functions from higher-level intel_fetch_uc_fw:
> * intel being the subject (taking the dev_priv as param)
> * fetch being the verb
> * uc_fw being the subject
>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <[email protected]>
> ---
<SNIP>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 41b7351..19b8966 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -185,11 +185,12 @@ struct intel_huc {
>
> /* intel_uc.c */
> void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +void intel_fetch_uc_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
Hmm, names of these two functions above are inconsistent now.
Maybe they both should start with i915 as they take dev_priv:
void i915_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void i915_uc_fetch_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
or treat intel_uc as a subject:
void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
void intel_uc_fetch_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
-Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
