Hi,

On 01-03-17 10:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Hans de Goede <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,

On 28-02-17 17:31, Jani Nikula wrote:

Cc: Hans, this probably applies to you as well.

I'm already always using git-send-email, so whatever the
reason why the CI system is not picking up my patches, this
aint it.

It doesn't look like your patches match [1], though. Do you have the
sendemail.xmailer config option set to false?

Nope, just send myself a test patch:

Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2017 11:05:32 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.3

Result: 250


But indeed the header is gone when it hits my own Inbox,
seems this gets stripped by the Red Hat smtp server somehow ?

I will file a ticket with our it department for this.

Regards,

Hans



BR,
Jani.



Regards,

Hans


On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
The new version patchwork is filtering out my patches for some reason.
Test if it's because it now insists on a capital [PATCH] in the subject.

Patchwork should be more version control agnostic than that.

The patchwork flavor at freedesktop.org expects patches are sent using
git send-email [1]. I hear otherwise there were too many false
positives.

Please either use git send-email, or add

X-Mailer: git-send-email haha only kidding

header into your patch mails.

I'm sorry for the inconvenience and lack of transparency on
this. Apparently git send-email is so ubiquitous nowadays that this
hasn't been much of a problem.


BR,
Jani.


[1] 
https://github.com/dlespiau/patchwork/blob/master/patchwork/bin/parsemail.py#L323


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to