On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:33:11PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > > Error is probably too high since it is an optional feature so > it is better not to create too much commotion and especially > cause BAT runs to log errors if firmware is not present.
I've seen confused users asking about HuC. It's a good idea IMO. Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]> -Michał > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> > Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <[email protected]> > Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c > index 8cf104350e5b..8817d404c616 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ int intel_huc_load(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > if (huc_fw->load_status == INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_PENDING) > huc_fw->load_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_FAIL; > > - DRM_ERROR("Failed to complete HuC uCode load with ret %d\n", err); > + DRM_NOTE("Failed to complete HuC uCode load with ret %d\n", err); > > return err; > } > -- > 2.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
