Don't throw a warning if we are given an invalid property id. While
here let's also bring back Robert' original idea of catching unhandled
enumeration values at compile time.

Fixes: eec688e1420d ("drm/i915: Add i915 perf infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Bragg <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 8c121187ff39..e52bc6a581e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1793,6 +1793,11 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
 
+               if (id == 0 || id >= DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_MAX) {
+                       DRM_DEBUG("Unknown i915 perf property ID\n");
+                       return -EINVAL;
+               }
+
                switch ((enum drm_i915_perf_property_id)id) {
                case DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_CTX_HANDLE:
                        props->single_context = 1;
@@ -1862,9 +1867,8 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                        props->oa_periodic = true;
                        props->oa_period_exponent = value;
                        break;
-               default:
+               case DRM_I915_PERF_PROP_MAX:
                        MISSING_CASE(id);
-                       DRM_DEBUG("Unknown i915 perf property ID\n");
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
 
-- 
2.9.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to