On to, 2017-03-30 at 15:50 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> As we now distinguish everywhere that can call
> i915_gem_retire_requests() following a successful wait_for_idle, we can
> remove the duplication by moving that call into i915_gem_wait_for_idle()
> itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

<SNIP>

> @@ -4180,8 +4180,6 @@ fault_irq_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>               goto err_unlock;
>  
>       /* Retire to kick idle work */

Stale comment, best before date was yesterday.

i915_gem_idle_gpu or something might be more descriptive now.

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to