Commit message to explain why. On ti, 2017-04-04 at 23:11 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
<SNIP> > > @@ -2441,6 +2441,8 @@ static int ____i915_gem_object_get_pages(struct > drm_i915_gem_object *obj) > struct sg_table *pages; > > GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj)); > + GEM_BUG_ON(!is_valid_gtt_page_size(obj->page_size)); > + GEM_BUG_ON(!is_valid_gtt_page_size(obj->gtt_page_size)); GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_PAGE_SIZE(obj->i915, obj->page_size)); GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_PAGE_SIZE(obj->i915, obj->gtt_page_size)); Patches should be split functionally, not for the sake of splitting. Tt's rather hard to complete review when the appearing code is pretty much no-op, so for next you could squash them a bit. For now, as a leap of faith; Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
