On 07/04/2017 14:32, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
There is no need to specify timeout as unsigned long since this parameter
will be consumed by usecs_to_jiffies() which expects unsigned int only.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index c9b0949..41188d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3098,7 +3098,7 @@ int intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
i915_reg_t reg,
const u32 mask,
const u32 value,
- const unsigned long timeout_ms);
+ const unsigned int timeout_ms);
static inline bool intel_gvt_active(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 6d1ea26..bcabf54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ int intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
i915_reg_t reg,
const u32 mask,
const u32 value,
- const unsigned long timeout_ms)
+ const unsigned int timeout_ms)
{
#define done ((I915_READ_FW(reg) & mask) == value)
int ret = wait_for_us(done, 2);
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
