Am 09.04.2017 um 18:02 schrieb Chris Wilson:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:08:53AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.04.2017 um 20:00 schrieb Chris Wilson:
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 07:49:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.04.2017 um 18:26 schrieb Chris Wilson:
Reserve 0 for general use a token meaning that the fence doesn't belong
to an ordered timeline (fence context).
NAK, we kept context allocation cheap to avoid exactly that.
However, they result in very sparse mappings.
Which is perfectly fine at least for how we use this in Radeon and Amdgpu.

The fence context is used as key for a hashtable, even when the
context is only used once we want an evenly distribution over all of
them.
The ht is a more expensive solution.

Not when the fences without contexts are rare.

Please elaborate further why it should be necessary now.
Because I want to efficiently exclude them from comparisons as
demonstrated by this small series as there may be several hundred such
fences as dependencies for this job.
That would horrible break Amdgpu, Radeon and the GPU scheduler
because all of them assume that context numbers are unique.
Why would it break if it respected the trivial notion of an unordered
timeline?

You seem to miss the point. We already had that discussion and decided against using no-context fences.

Now we have a whole bunch of cases over different drivers/components where we assume uniqueness of fence contexts.

If you change this without fixing all those cases they will just subtle break, probably without anybody noticing the problem immediately.

So if you don't want to scan all drivers for such cases (and I know at least three of hand) and fix them before that patch then that is a clear no-go for this patch.

I suggest to just use two separate fence contexts for you clflush problem in i915. We have a similar situation in the GPU scheduler solve it the same way.

Regards,
Christian.

-Chris


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to