On 05/05/2017 10:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:31:14AM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:32:34PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
On ke, 2017-05-03 at 12:37 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Explicitly assign the default priority, and give it a name (macro).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
<SNIP>
kref_init(&ctx->ref);
list_add_tail(&ctx->link, &dev_priv->context_list);
ctx->i915 = dev_priv;
+ ctx->priority = I915_PRIORITY_DFL;
I915_PRIORITY_DEFAULT would work better.
On the one hand I have the symmetry with MIN, DFL, MAX, on the other
hand DFL is plain bizarre.
DEF?
I915_PRIORITY_DEFEAT. I'm perfectly happy just to 0, pesky Tvrtko.
Will to argue deflated. :) I suggested it for benefit in one of the
later patches which explicitly compared against zero. if < 0 &&
!cap_sys_admin or something.. I thought being explicit what zero means
there would be a good thing.
DEFAULT or DEF both sounds good to me. Or NORMAL. DFL is not entirely
new (SIG_DFL) but it does look very weird.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
