On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 14:32 -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> 
> The Analogix 7737 DP to HDMI converter requires reduced N and M values when
> to operate correctly at HBR2. Detect this IC by its OUI value of 0x0022B9.
> 

I like this approach because it does not change the link m/n values for
sinks that were working before "drm/i915/dp: reduce link M/N parameters"
and works around the dongle issue too. 

The other option is to add a quirk for the sink in
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100755) instead of this
patch.


Assuming we go with this approach, I have added some review comments.

We need the patch to refer to 
1) "commit 9a86cda drm/i915/dp: reduce link M/N parameters"
2) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93578
3) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100755

Fixes and Bugzilla tags perhaps.

> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c      | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c  |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 74dffbe..492e47e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -563,7 +563,8 @@ struct intel_link_m_n {
>  
>  void intel_link_compute_m_n(int bpp, int nlanes,
>                           int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
> -                         struct intel_link_m_n *m_n);
> +                         struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
> +                             bool reduce_m_n);
>  
>  /* Interface history:
>   *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 7bcc604..8920a99 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6104,7 +6104,7 @@ static int ironlake_fdi_compute_config(struct 
> intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>       pipe_config->fdi_lanes = lane;
>  
>       intel_link_compute_m_n(pipe_config->pipe_bpp, lane, fdi_dotclock,
> -                            link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n);
> +                            link_bw, &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, false);
>  
>       ret = ironlake_check_fdi_lanes(dev, intel_crtc->pipe, pipe_config);
>       if (ret == -EINVAL && pipe_config->pipe_bpp > 6*3) {
> @@ -6280,7 +6280,8 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc 
> *crtc,
>  }
>  
>  static void compute_m_n(unsigned int m, unsigned int n,
> -                     uint32_t *ret_m, uint32_t *ret_n)
> +                     uint32_t *ret_m, uint32_t *ret_n,
> +                        bool reduce_m_n)
>  {
>       /*
>        * Reduce M/N as much as possible without loss in precision. Several DP
> @@ -6288,9 +6289,11 @@ static void compute_m_n(unsigned int m, unsigned int n,
>        * values. The passed in values are more likely to have the least
>        * significant bits zero than M after rounding below, so do this first.
>        */
> -     while ((m & 1) == 0 && (n & 1) == 0) {
> -             m >>= 1;
> -             n >>= 1;
> +     if (reduce_m_n) {
> +             while ((m & 1) == 0 && (n & 1) == 0) {

Can't we get away with reducing just 1 bit here?

> +                     m >>= 1;
> +                     n >>= 1;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       *ret_n = min_t(unsigned int, roundup_pow_of_two(n), DATA_LINK_N_MAX);
> @@ -6301,16 +6304,19 @@ static void compute_m_n(unsigned int m, unsigned int 
> n,
>  void
>  intel_link_compute_m_n(int bits_per_pixel, int nlanes,
>                      int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
> -                    struct intel_link_m_n *m_n)
> +                    struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
> +                       bool reduce_m_n)
>  {
>       m_n->tu = 64;
>  
>       compute_m_n(bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock,
>                   link_clock * nlanes * 8,
> -                 &m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n);
> +                 &m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n,
> +                 reduce_m_n);
>  
>       compute_m_n(pixel_clock, link_clock,
> -                 &m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n);
> +                 &m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n,
> +                 reduce_m_n);
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool intel_panel_use_ssc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 4a6feb6..f4c0582 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1548,6 +1548,20 @@ static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp)
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("common rates: %s\n", str);
>  }
>  
> +bool __intel_reduced_m_n(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)

dp_branch_needs_reduced_m_n() ? The naming fits the question-like format
for bool returning functions.

> +{
> +     struct intel_dp_desc *desc = &intel_dp->desc;
> +     bool ret = false;
> +
> +     /* Analogix 7737 needs reduced N and M at HBR2 link rates */
> +     if (desc->oui[0] == 0x00 &&
> +         desc->oui[1] == 0x22 &&
> +         desc->oui[2] == 0xb9)
> +             ret = true;
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  bool
>  __intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct intel_dp_desc *desc)
>  {
> @@ -1568,6 +1582,8 @@ bool intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       if (!__intel_dp_read_desc(intel_dp, desc))
>               return false;
>  
> +     intel_dp->reduce_m_n = __intel_reduced_m_n(intel_dp);


As you are setting intel_dp->reduce_m_n in the caller, why not just pass
intel_dp_desc? The function could just be an inline 

        return  (desc->oui[0] == 0x00 &&
                 desc->oui[1] == 0x22 &&
                 desc->oui[2] == 0xb9)

How about restricting this workaround with a drm_dp_is_branch() ?


> +
>       dev_id_len = strnlen(desc->device_id, sizeof(desc->device_id));
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP %s: OUI %*phD%s dev-ID %*pE HW-rev %d.%d SW-rev 
> %d.%d\n",
>                     drm_dp_is_branch(intel_dp->dpcd) ? "branch" : "sink",
> @@ -1790,7 +1806,8 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp,
>       intel_link_compute_m_n(bpp, lane_count,
>                              adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>                              pipe_config->port_clock,
> -                            &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
> +                            &pipe_config->dp_m_n,
> +                             intel_dp->reduce_m_n);
>  
>       if (intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode != NULL &&
>               dev_priv->drrs.type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
> @@ -1798,7 +1815,8 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp,
>                       intel_link_compute_m_n(bpp, lane_count,
>                               intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock,
>                               pipe_config->port_clock,
> -                             &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2);
> +                             &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2,
> +                             intel_dp->reduce_m_n);
>       }
>  
>       /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 68c788e..81fd8dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ static bool intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct 
> intel_encoder *encoder,
>       intel_link_compute_m_n(bpp, lane_count,
>                              adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>                              pipe_config->port_clock,
> -                            &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
> +                            &pipe_config->dp_m_n,
> +                             intel_dp->reduce_m_n);
>  
>       pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu = slots;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index e8de2f67..50e5077 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1057,6 +1057,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
>  
>       /* Displayport compliance testing */
>       struct intel_dp_compliance compliance;
> +     bool reduce_m_n;
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_lspcon {

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to