On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:54:18PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
Oops, missed that, applied.
Btw, for regression fixes like that, could you perhaps auto-generate the
Fixes: line per the kernel process? Makes it easier for me to know where
to apply something :-)
Thanks, Daniel
> ---
> arcpgu_crtc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
> index 99fbdae..611af74 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arc/arcpgu_crtc.c
> @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs arc_pgu_crtc_funcs = {
> .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_crtc_destroy_state,
> };
>
> -enum drm_mode_status arc_pgu_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> - const struct drm_display_mode
> *mode)
> +static enum drm_mode_status arc_pgu_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> + const struct
> drm_display_mode *mode)
> {
> struct arcpgu_drm_private *arcpgu = crtc_to_arcpgu_priv(crtc);
> long rate, clk_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
