Hi,

On Monday 17 July 2017 04:01 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 17-07-17 om 12:32 schreef Mahesh Kumar:
Hi,


On Monday 17 July 2017 03:22 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, David Binderman <dcb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello there,
Hello. No need to include LKML for stuff like this. But Cc'd the folks
from the broken commit.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4467]: (warning) Comparison of a boolean 
expression with an integer other than 0 or 1.

Source code is

          else if ((ddb_allocation && ddb_allocation /
              fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line)) >= 1)
ddb_allocation being integer was intentional.
Other than that code has improper parentheses as well.
intention was if ddb_allocation is not 0 & (ddb_allocation / plane_blocks_per_line 
>= 1) then execute the condition.
it should have been
     else if (ddb_allocation && (ddb_allocation / 
fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line) >= 1))

will post a fix.

thanks.

-Mahesh
Broken by

commit d555cb5827d603244969e08444340e3db78c8a37
Author: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
Date:   Wed May 17 17:28:29 2017 +0530

      drm/i915/skl+: use linetime latency if ddb size is not available

The broken code has since been removed by bb9d85f6e9de ("drm/i915/skl:
New ddb allocation algorithm") but restored by 9a30a26122c3 ("Revert
"drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm""). *sigh*.

Mahesh et al, please figure it out.


BR,
Jani.


Would this work?

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 78b9acfc64c0..b9b3d8d45016 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4681,8 +4681,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                if ((cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal / 512 < 1) &&
                    (plane_bytes_per_line / 512 < 1))
                        selected_result = method2;
-               else if ((ddb_allocation && ddb_allocation /
-                       fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line)) >= 
1)
+               else if (ddb_allocation >=
+                        fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line))
yes, this would even simplify the condition :)
-Mahesh
                        selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
                else if (latency >= linetime_us)
                        selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to