Hi,

On Thursday 10 August 2017 02:22 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>

They're slightly different than the gen 9 calculations.

v2: Remove TODO comment. Code matches recent spec.

Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 1622e6f3c6b6..857e2f0a4b15 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4274,8 +4274,9 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
   * should allow pixel_rate up to ~2 GHz which seems sufficient since max
   * 2xcdclk is 1350 MHz and the pixel rate should never exceed that.
  */
-static uint_fixed_16_16_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint8_t cpp,
-                                        uint32_t latency)
+static uint_fixed_16_16_t
+skl_wm_method1(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t pixel_rate,
+              uint8_t cpp, uint32_t latency)
  {
        uint32_t wm_intermediate_val;
        uint_fixed_16_16_t ret;
@@ -4285,6 +4286,10 @@ static uint_fixed_16_16_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t 
pixel_rate, uint8_t cpp,
wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate * cpp;
        ret = div_fixed16(wm_intermediate_val, 1000 * 512);
+
+       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
+               ret.val += 1 << 16;
Please use available fp16.16 wrapper to add
       ret = add_fixed16_u32(ret, 1);
+
        return ret;
  }
@@ -4436,11 +4441,15 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, plane_bytes_per_line = width * cpp;
        if (y_tiled) {
-               interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line *
-                                          y_min_scanlines, 512);
+               interm_pbpl = plane_bytes_per_line * y_min_scanlines;
+
+               if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
+                       interm_pbpl++;
+
+               interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(interm_pbpl, 512);
It looks wrong, my interpretation of Bspec is:
interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line * y_min_scanlines, 512);
                 if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
                        interm_pbpl++;

-Mahesh
                plane_blocks_per_line = div_fixed16(interm_pbpl,
                                                        y_min_scanlines);
-       } else if (x_tiled) {
+       } else if (x_tiled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 9) {
                interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
                plane_blocks_per_line = u32_to_fixed16(interm_pbpl);
        } else {
@@ -4448,7 +4457,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                plane_blocks_per_line = u32_to_fixed16(interm_pbpl);
        }
- method1 = skl_wm_method1(plane_pixel_rate, cpp, latency);
+       method1 = skl_wm_method1(dev_priv, plane_pixel_rate, cpp, latency);
        method2 = skl_wm_method2(plane_pixel_rate,
                                 cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal,
                                 latency,

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to