I see. Thanks for the explanation! :) -----Original Message----- From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 5:20 PM To: Wang, Zhi A <[email protected]>; Vivi, Rodrigo <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Widawsky, Benjamin <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [RFCv6 2/2] drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management
On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 08:28 +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > Do you mean I still keep I915_WRITE(xxxxx) in xxxx_setup_private_pat() like > before? Then changed them in a new patch? No, I mean use the new code structure, but make sure all register writes are equal to what they were before (and please send a separate patch for the CNL caching issue before that). Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
