On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Sparse enforces that GFP flags are only manipulated inside gfp_t locals.
> 
> Fixes: 4d470f7359c4 ("drm/i915: Avoid undefined behaviour of "u32 >> 32"")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 8a9d37ac16d4..67317b79b9e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int eb_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>                * direct lookup.
>                */
>               do {
> -                     unsigned int flags;
> +                     gfp_t flags;
>  
>                       /* While we can still reduce the allocation size, don't
>                        * raise a warning and allow the allocation to fail.
> -- 
> 2.14.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to