From: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]> Since gen 7+ now run the new gen7_render_ring_flush function.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 32e3034..dc5272b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -218,6 +218,11 @@ gen6_render_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 scratch_addr = pc->gtt_offset + 128; int ret; + /* Force SNB workarounds for PIPE_CONTROL flushes */ + ret = intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(ring); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* Just flush everything. Experiments have shown that reducing the * number of bits based on the write domains has little performance * impact. @@ -305,20 +310,6 @@ gen7_render_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, return 0; } -static int -gen6_render_ring_flush__wa(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, - u32 invalidate_domains, u32 flush_domains) -{ - int ret; - - /* Force SNB workarounds for PIPE_CONTROL flushes */ - ret = intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(ring); - if (ret) - return ret; - - return gen6_render_ring_flush(ring, invalidate_domains, flush_domains); -} - static void ring_write_tail(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 value) { @@ -1435,7 +1426,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) ring->add_request = gen6_add_request; ring->flush = gen7_render_ring_flush; if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen == 6) - ring->flush = gen6_render_ring_flush__wa; + ring->flush = gen6_render_ring_flush; ring->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq; ring->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq; ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_USER_INTERRUPT; -- 1.7.11.2 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
