On 09/07/2017 04:03 AM, Michał Winiarski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:15:49PM -0700, Oscar Mateo wrote:
Afaict, GEN9_GAMT_ECO_REG_RW_IA does not live in the context, so writing
it on every context creation is overkill (and wrong).
v2: Missing end parenthesis
Though there was a discussion whether this belongs in init_workarounds, or
init_clock_gating - I do believe that moving things around and/or renaming
things is something that should be done in a separate patch.
I compared modified registers with the spec. It all checks out.
With the missing end parenthesis added (you're still missing some in a different
patch ;) ), the whole series is:
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
-Michał
Yes, I reached the same conclusion myself after seeing how many
wrongly-applied WAs we had. I would still like to reach an agreement on
the refactoring of the WA code, though, because the whole thing is very
confusing as it stands now.
Thanks for the review!
-- Oscar
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
