Juvenile no 00

-------- Original message --------
From: "Wang, Zhi A" <[email protected]>
Date: 9/14/17 8:03 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>, "Vivi, Rodrigo" 
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], "Widawsky, Benjamin" 
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix a typo in i915_ppat_get()

Sorry for the trouble. It's because we have 4 different entries with different 
attributes and every time we match an entry by cache attribute, we got a 
perfect match...

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 9:41 PM
To: Vivi, Rodrigo <[email protected]>; Wang, Zhi A <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; Widawsky, Benjamin 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix a typo in i915_ppat_get()

Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-09-14 18:36:49)
>
> well, I wouldn't call this as a typo.
> This is a logic fix and deserves a better subject a proper commit
> message an also fixes tag:

It should work either way, just the bug doesn't allow reuse.

The question to ask is why didn't the selftest pick this up? It passes on bdw...
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to