Em Ter, 2017-09-26 às 12:43 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> This is heavily based on a initial patch provided by Ville
> plus all changes provided later by Ander.
> 
> As Geminilake, Cannonlake also supports 2 pixels per clock.
> 
> Different from Geminilake we are not implementing the 99% Wa.
> But we can revisit that decision later if we find out
> any limitation on later CNL SKUs.
> 
> v2: Rebase on top of commit 'd305e0614601 ("drm/i915: Track
> minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock")'

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>

> 
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c   | 7 +------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index d6befabd6ed5..eabaf57b83ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1995,12 +1995,7 @@ static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       int max_cdclk_freq = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
>  
>       if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> -             /*
> -              * FIXME: Allow '2 * max_cdclk_freq'
> -              * once DDI clock voltage requirements are
> -              * handled correctly.
> -              */
> -             return max_cdclk_freq;
> +             return 2 * max_cdclk_freq;
>       else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>               /*
>                * FIXME: Limiting to 99% as a temporary workaround.
> See
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 026fa5460fe5..487b43ba3139 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -12801,7 +12801,7 @@ skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state
>       crtc_clock = crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
>       max_dotclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)-
> >cdclk.logical.cdclk;
>  
> -     if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> +     if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
>               max_dotclk *= 2;
>  
>       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || max_dotclk < crtc_clock))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index c66af09e27a7..52c4c194aa51 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3932,6 +3932,7 @@ skl_pipe_downscale_amount(const struct
> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>                                 struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
>  {
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc-
> >base.dev);
>       struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = &cstate->base;
>       struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->state;
>       struct drm_plane *plane;
> @@ -3974,7 +3975,7 @@ int skl_check_pipe_max_pixel_rate(struct
> intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>       crtc_clock = crtc_state->adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
>       dotclk = to_intel_atomic_state(state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk;
>  
> -     if (IS_GEMINILAKE(to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev)))
> +     if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
>               dotclk *= 2;
>  
>       pipe_max_pixel_rate = div_round_up_u32_fixed16(dotclk,
> pipe_downscale);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to