Don't call it when we can do like the other functions and just look at
port->port. Also rename the intel_digital_port variable to make it
look like the other functions.

My main goal here is to prevent the copy-pasters from propagating the
call to other parts of the code.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index ca48bce..6fb90fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4614,14 +4614,11 @@ static bool bdw_digital_port_connected(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 }
 
 static bool bxt_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-                                      struct intel_digital_port 
*intel_dig_port)
+                                      struct intel_digital_port *port)
 {
-       struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
-       enum port port;
        u32 bit;
 
-       port = intel_hpd_pin_to_port(intel_encoder->hpd_pin);
-       switch (port) {
+       switch (port->port) {
        case PORT_A:
                bit = BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIA;
                break;
@@ -4632,7 +4629,7 @@ static bool bxt_digital_port_connected(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
                bit = BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIC;
                break;
        default:
-               MISSING_CASE(port);
+               MISSING_CASE(port->port);
                return false;
        }
 
-- 
2.9.5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to