On 10/11/2017 11:00 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:54:13 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com> wrote:

In i915_reset/gem_sanitize, GPU will be reset and driver state about
GuC/HuC load status will be invalid. Hence, we mark both GuC/HuC as not
loaded/NONE.

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |  4 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index f1a785a..a4bbf6c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2954,6 +2954,8 @@ int i915_gem_reset_prepare(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
    i915_gem_revoke_fences(dev_priv);
+    intel_uc_sanitize(dev_priv);
+
     return err;
 }
@@ -4636,6 +4638,8 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
         mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
     }
+    intel_uc_sanitize(i915);
+
     /*
      * If we inherit context state from the BIOS or earlier occupants
      * of the GPU, the GPU may be in an inconsistent state when we
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 25acf8f..9010ab5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -438,3 +438,21 @@ void intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
    intel_uc_init_hw(dev_priv);
 }
+
+/**
+ * intel_uc_sanitize() - Sanitize uC state.
+ * @dev_priv: i915 device private
+ *
+ * This function marks load_status as FIRMWARE_NONE and sanitizes state of
+ * other GuC tasks.
+ */
+void intel_uc_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+    struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.fw;
+    struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &dev_priv->huc.fw;

nitpick:

    struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
    struct intel_huc *huc = &dev_priv->huc;
Sure. will update uc_fw through these struct pointers.

+
+    if (i915_modparams.enable_guc_loading) {
+        guc_fw->load_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
+        huc_fw->load_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
+    }

Maybe we should move this patch before 13/21 to better handle
"skip_load_on_resume" case ?
yes. in v14 i have moved this patch earlier.

+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
index f741ccc..fbae5d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
@@ -37,5 +37,6 @@
 int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+void intel_uc_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
#endif

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to