Thanks for the patch! Actually I would prefer that we can have different error 
messages here. E.g. like copy_gma_to_hva fail in which part of ring buffer. Or 
we can directly remove the error message since usually if it fails it means a 
bug of MPT module when GVT-g is accessing the guest memory by Xen/KVM functions 
and it shouldn’t happen unless MPT modules has a bug, :( so I wish the error 
message can be reported in MPT module. :)

Thanks for the patch.  :)

Thanks,
Zhi.

-----Original Message-----
From: SF Markus Elfring [mailto:elfr...@users.sourceforge.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 3:26 PM
To: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; 
intel-gvt-...@lists.freedesktop.org; David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>; Jani 
Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>; Joonas Lahtinen 
<joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>; 
Zhenyu Wang <zhen...@linux.intel.com>; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.w...@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Use common error handling code in 
shadow_workload_ring_buffer()

From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:20:06 +0200

Add a jump target so that a call of the function "gvt_vgpu_err" is stored only 
once at the end of this function implementation.
Replace two calls by goto statements.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
index 2c0ccbb817dc..caa181380958 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cmd_parser.c
@@ -2640,10 +2640,9 @@ static int shadow_workload_ring_buffer(struct 
intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
        if (gma_head > gma_tail) {
                ret = copy_gma_to_hva(vgpu, vgpu->gtt.ggtt_mm,
                                      gma_head, gma_top, shadow_ring_buffer_va);
-               if (ret < 0) {
-                       gvt_vgpu_err("fail to copy guest ring buffer\n");
-                       return ret;
-               }
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       goto report_failure;
+
                shadow_ring_buffer_va += ret;
                gma_head = workload->rb_start;
        }
@@ -2651,11 +2650,14 @@ static int shadow_workload_ring_buffer(struct 
intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
        /* copy head or start <-> tail */
        ret = copy_gma_to_hva(vgpu, vgpu->gtt.ggtt_mm, gma_head, gma_tail,
                                shadow_ring_buffer_va);
-       if (ret < 0) {
-               gvt_vgpu_err("fail to copy guest ring buffer\n");
-               return ret;
-       }
+       if (ret < 0)
+               goto report_failure;
+
        return 0;
+
+report_failure:
+       gvt_vgpu_err("fail to copy guest ring buffer\n");
+       return ret;
 }
 
 int intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_ringbuffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
--
2.14.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to