On Wed, 01 Nov 2017, Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com> wrote:
> To make looping through transcoders in intel_ddi.c more generic, let's switch
> to use 'for_each_pipe()' macro to do this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index ace674c..3df991b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ bool intel_ddi_get_hw_state(struct intel_encoder
> *encoder,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - for (i = TRANSCODER_A; i <= TRANSCODER_C; i++) {
> + for_each_pipe(dev_priv, i) {
It gives me an uneasy feeling to conflate pipes and transcoders like
this. I think we've tried to be more clear about the distinction
elsewhere.
BR,
Jani.
> tmp = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(i));
>
> if ((tmp & TRANS_DDI_PORT_MASK) == TRANS_DDI_SELECT_PORT(port))
> {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
