On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 10:11 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Originally it was anticipated that timeouts would be a rare event, and > so merit a warning that the test was incomplete. However, for igt we > keep the timeout low, and hitting the timeout is intentional. It no > longer necessitates a warning, but to be expected. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
