On 27/11/2017 11:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
We have chosen batch_duration_ns to be the minimum duration we need to
meet our accuracy requirements for legacy ringbuffer PMU sampling. As
such, we need to be careful to use multiples of it during tests, and not
split it into different phases with a test, like multi_client does.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 8d58ecea..e527ba58 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -638,9 +638,9 @@ multi_client(int gem_fd, const struct
intel_execution_engine2 *e)
fd[1] = open_pmu(config);
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
- igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, batch_duration_ns);
+ igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, 2 * batch_duration_ns);
- slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 3000);
+ slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
val[1] = pmu_read_single(fd[1]);
close(fd[1]);
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ multi_client(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd[0]);
- assert_within_epsilon(val[0], batch_duration_ns, tolerance);
+ assert_within_epsilon(val[0], 2 * batch_duration_ns, tolerance);
assert_within_epsilon(val[1], slept, tolerance);
}
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
