On Monday, November 27, 2017 11:58 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> 
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.

I think that this will be useful. I introduced multi domains into
ARM-based PCIe driver. (e.g. domain 0, and domain 1) So, APIs to choose
domain will be used later.

> 
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of
> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().
> 
> Hard-coding the domain as 0.
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <ok...@codeaurora.org>

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingooh...@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
> b/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
> index d843296..6a34ab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/apple_bl.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int apple_bl_add(struct acpi_device *dev)
>       struct pci_dev *host;
>       int intensity;
> 
> -     host = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, 0);
> +     host = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, 0);
> 
>       if (!host) {
>               pr_err("unable to find PCI host\n");
> --
> 1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to