Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.

Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this rc?

On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:54 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
> 
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.

<SNIP>

> 0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, 
> glk"")

This patch still fails to apply and I'm looking at -rc3 already.

Rodrigo and Radhakrishna, do we actually want to see the patch
backported?

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to