On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:19:03PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since capturing the error state requires fiddling around with the GGTT
> to read arbitrary buffers and is itself run under stop_machine(), it
> deadlocks the machine (effectively a hard hang) when run in conjunction
> with Broxton's VTd workaround to serialize GGTT access.
>
> Fixes: 0ef34ad6222a ("drm/i915: Serialize GTT/Aperture accesses on BXT")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jon Bloomfield <[email protected]>
> Cc: John Harrison <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 48418fb81066..e6c7e8e53815 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -1813,6 +1813,10 @@ void i915_capture_error_state(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> if (!i915_modparams.error_capture)
> return;
>
> + /* Prevent recursively calling stop_machine() and deadlocking. */
> + if (intel_ggtt_update_needs_vtd_wa(dev_priv))
> + return;
I'd put this closer to the stop machine, at the head of
i915_capture_gpu_state(). If the bogus debug output annoys then we could
switch that to an PTR_ERR return value I guess. But I guess this here is
ok too, so either way:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> +
> if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gpu_error.first_error))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.15.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
