On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 05:26:53AM +0000, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> The global variable dev_priv->psr.sink_support is set if an eDP sink
> supports PSR. Use this instead of redoing the check with is_edp_psr().
> Combine source and sink support checks into a macro that can be used to
> return early from psr_{invalidate, single_frame_update, flush}.
>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 19 ++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 30f791f89d64..48676e99316e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ static inline void
> intel_backlight_device_unregister(struct intel_connector *con
>
>
> /* intel_psr.c */
> +#define CAN_PSR(dev_priv) (HAS_PSR(dev_priv) && dev_priv->psr.sink_support)
not sure about the "CAN"... but I don't have better suggestion and I believe
it is somehow clear enough...
> void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index c4d75e82a1df..76339cf387cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -56,14 +56,6 @@
> #include "intel_drv.h"
> #include "i915_drv.h"
>
> -static bool is_edp_psr(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -{
> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> - return false;
> -
> - return intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED;
> -}
I wonder why we haven't done this before in favor of sink_support///
my bad...
> -
> static bool vlv_is_psr_active_on_pipe(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> @@ -358,10 +350,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> &crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode;
> int psr_setup_time;
>
> - if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> - return;
> -
> - if (!is_edp_psr(intel_dp))
> + if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> if (!i915_modparams.enable_psr) {
> @@ -794,7 +783,7 @@ void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum pipe pipe;
> u32 val;
>
> - if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> + if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> /*
> @@ -843,7 +832,7 @@ void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> enum pipe pipe;
>
> - if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> + if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> @@ -883,7 +872,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> enum pipe pipe;
>
> - if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
> + if (!CAN_PSR(dev_priv))
> return;
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
