On 22/12/2017 11:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
Don't rely on the timer being precise when we can sleep for a known
duration.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 96091b853..b3b289656 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct
intel_execution_engine2 *e,
const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e_;
uint64_t val[num_engines];
int fd[num_engines];
+ unsigned long slept;
igt_spin_t *spin;
unsigned int busy_idx, i;
@@ -202,9 +203,8 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
igt_assert_eq(i, num_engines);
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
- igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, batch_duration_ns);
-
- gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
+ slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
pmu_read_multi(fd[0], num_engines, val);
log_busy(fd[0], num_engines, val);
@@ -212,13 +212,13 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct
intel_execution_engine2 *e,
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd[0]);
- assert_within_epsilon(val[busy_idx], batch_duration_ns, tolerance);
+ assert_within_epsilon(val[busy_idx], slept, tolerance);
for (i = 0; i < num_engines; i++) {
if (i == busy_idx)
continue;
assert_within_epsilon(val[i], 0.0f, tolerance);
}
-
+ gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
}
static void
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
