On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 13:20 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Since commit 'c4fb60b9aba9 ("drm/i915/bios: add DP max link
> rate to VBT child device struct")' we have the new entry
> defined for max dp rate that is in use for CNL.
>
> Let's start using it for all VBT 216+ and
> also organize the cnl adjusted rates in terms of rate
> and not array size.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
<snip>
> +static int intel_dp_adjusted_max_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + const struct ddi_vbt_port_info *info =
> + &dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[dig_port->base.port];
> +
> + if (info->dp_max_link_rate)
> + return info->dp_max_link_rate;
What if this value is higher than cnl_adjusted_max_rate() ?
-DK
> +
> + if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
> + return cnl_adjusted_max_rate(intel_dp);
> +
> + return INT_MAX; /* No adjusted limit */
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
