Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tools/intel_reg: Fix segfault in intel_reg dump

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 02 Feb 2018, Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> We need to zero out the builtin reg spec we are parsing into.
> Otherwise engine will be uninitialized and we segfault when trying
> to find engine and accessing reg->engine in later stage.
>
> Fixes: 7f0be0e7d9be ("tools/intel_reg: Add reading and writing registers 
> through engine")
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104895
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>

Personal preference, I would've gone for = {} but this is fine.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

> ---
>  tools/intel_reg_decode.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/intel_reg_decode.c b/tools/intel_reg_decode.c
> index 46b19676..b351dcb5 100644
> --- a/tools/intel_reg_decode.c
> +++ b/tools/intel_reg_decode.c
> @@ -2748,6 +2748,8 @@ static ssize_t get_regs(struct reg **regs, size_t 
> *nregs, ssize_t index,
>                               &known_registers[i].regs[j];
>                       struct reg reg;
>  
> +                     memset(&reg, 0, sizeof(reg));
> +
>                       /* XXX: Could be optimized. */
>                       parse_port_desc(&reg, NULL);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx