On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:01:54AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and
> removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this
> however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the
> old, and still valid, seqno, or it may match the cleared seqno with the
> now zero rq->global_seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and
> signaling the fence.
>
> Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the
> execution queue")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206094633.30181-1-ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
> (cherry picked from commit fd10e2ce9905030d922e179a8047a4d50daffd8e)
applied to fixes. Thanks
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> index bd40fea16b4f..f54ddda9fdad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> @@ -594,29 +594,16 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine,
> spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
> }
>
> -static bool signal_valid(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> -{
> - return intel_wait_check_request(&request->signaling.wait, request);
> -}
> -
> static bool signal_complete(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> {
> if (!request)
> return false;
>
> - /* If another process served as the bottom-half it may have already
> - * signalled that this wait is already completed.
> - */
> - if (intel_wait_complete(&request->signaling.wait))
> - return signal_valid(request);
> -
> - /* Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
> + /*
> + * Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
> * seqno to be visible or if the GPU hung.
> */
> - if (__i915_request_irq_complete(request))
> - return true;
> -
> - return false;
> + return __i915_request_irq_complete(request);
> }
>
> static struct drm_i915_gem_request *to_signaler(struct rb_node *rb)
> @@ -659,9 +646,13 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(void *arg)
> request = i915_gem_request_get_rcu(request);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> if (signal_complete(request)) {
> - local_bh_disable();
> - dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
> - local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
> + if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
> + &request->fence.flags)) {
> + local_bh_disable();
> + dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
> +
> GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
> + local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
> + }
>
> spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
>
> --
> 2.16.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
