On 2/14/2018 9:36 AM, abhijeet.ku...@intel.com wrote:
From: Abhijeet Kumar <abhijeet.ku...@intel.com>

  sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c
index 8c1b07e300a8..377d5719b4cd 100644
--- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c
@@ -2714,7 +2714,7 @@ static unsigned int hda_sync_power_state(struct hda_codec 
        int count;
for (count = 0;count < 500; count++) {
-               state = snd_hda_codec_read(codec, fg, 0,
+               state = snd_hdac_codec_read(&codec->core, fg, 0,
                                           AC_VERB_GET_POWER_STATE, 0);
                if (state & AC_PWRST_ERROR){

Both tests are passing on hsw and bdw devices.I can conclude that none of my changes in "ALSA: hda: Make use of core codec functions to sync power state" is "*directly*" causing the regression. As this patch series changes the previously defined sync function similar to the latest one (the one defined
in the defaulter patch).

Sidenote- Sorry for the missing commit message, it was just a HACK patch. :)

Intel-gfx mailing list

Reply via email to