On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Split the 64b multiplication from the division so that it doesn't sprawl
> across a couple of lines and use mul_u32_u32() instead of open-coding
> the 64b conversion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> index 41296935ef11..41d00b1603e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> @@ -419,8 +419,9 @@ static uint32_t scale(uint32_t source_val,
>       source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max);
>  
>       /* avoid overflows */
> -     target_val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) *
> -                     (target_max - target_min), source_max - source_min);
> +     target_val = mul_u32_u32(source_val - source_min,
> +                              target_max - target_min);
> +     target_val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(target_val, source_max - source_min);
>       target_val += target_min;
>  
>       return target_val;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to