On 21/02/2018 10:32, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,
On 2/21/2018 3:42 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi guys,
I was trying to do a test run with GuC enabled but I am possibly doing
something wrong, or something is broken on SKL GVT machine. Could you
please check:
This is known issue where movntdqa support is disabled for hypervisor.
GuC init/load is currently tied up with logging setup that depends on
movntdqa.
Michal Winiarski will be sharing new changes for GuC log/relay support
and then we can bypass this check for GuC load.
Can use this meanwhile https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/205723/
for CI.
Ah.. thank you!
Regards,
Tvrtko
On 21/02/2018 08:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
index 430f5f9d0ff4..3deae1e22974 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
param(int, disable_power_well, -1) \
param(int, enable_ips, 1) \
param(int, invert_brightness, 0) \
- param(int, enable_guc, 0) \
+ param(int, enable_guc, -1) \
param(int, guc_log_level, 0) \
param(char *, guc_firmware_path, NULL) \
param(char *, huc_firmware_path, NULL) \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
index 9f1bac6398fb..7f2af5b43a2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
enable_guc |= ENABLE_GUC_LOAD_HUC;
/* Any platform specific fine-tuning can be done here */
+ if (intel_gvt_active(dev_priv))
+ enable_guc = false;
return enable_guc;
}
This patch results with:
<7>[ 10.742713] [drm:intel_uc_sanitize_options [i915]] enable_guc=3
(submission:yes huc:yes)
<7>[ 10.742748] [drm:intel_uc_sanitize_options [i915]]
guc_log_level=0 (enabled:no verbosity:-1)
and then:
<4>[ 10.792405] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4>[ 10.792407] WARN_ON(!i915_memcpy_from_wc(((void *)0), ((void
*)0), 0))
<4>[ 10.792458] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 236 at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c:616
intel_guc_log_create+0x144/0x1c0 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792460] Modules linked in: i915(+) crct10dif_pclmul
crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel e1000 prime_numbers i2c_piix4
<4>[ 10.792474] CPU: 0 PID: 236 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted
4.16.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_8097+ #1
<4>[ 10.792476] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
1996), BIOS rel-1.10.1-0-g8891697-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
<4>[ 10.792510] RIP: 0010:intel_guc_log_create+0x144/0x1c0 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792512] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000023fae0 EFLAGS: 00010286
<4>[ 10.792515] RAX: 000000000000003a RBX: ffff8800759d0ed0 RCX:
0000000000000001
<4>[ 10.792516] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: ffffffff8210fb61 RDI:
00000000ffffffff
<4>[ 10.792518] RBP: ffff8800759d0ed0 R08: ffff880079fd8940 R09:
00000000bf56e8ae
<4>[ 10.792519] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff8800759d0070
<4>[ 10.792521] R13: ffff880076a4da18 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
ffff88007c93c548
<4>[ 10.792525] FS: 00007ff6ffc7f8c0(0000)
GS:ffff88007fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>[ 10.792526] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>[ 10.792528] CR2: 00007fdabb4ab000 CR3: 0000000079fc6003 CR4:
00000000003606f0
<4>[ 10.792529] Call Trace:
<4>[ 10.792565] intel_guc_init+0x5d/0x100 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792642] intel_uc_init+0x29/0xa0 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792694] i915_gem_init+0x198/0x540 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792727] ? intel_uc_fw_fetch+0x2db/0x650 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792755] i915_driver_load+0xa56/0x1090 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792760] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xde/0x1c0
<4>[ 10.792789] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915]
<4>[ 10.792793] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
<4>[ 10.792798] driver_probe_device+0x2a4/0x480
<4>[ 10.792802] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
<4>[ 10.792804] ? driver_probe_device+0x480/0x480
<4>[ 10.792807] ? driver_probe_device+0x480/0x480
<4>[ 10.792810] bus_for_each_dev+0x50/0x90
<4>[ 10.792814] bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260
<4>[ 10.792818] driver_register+0x52/0xc0
<4>[ 10.792820] ? 0xffffffffa0294000
<4>[ 10.792822] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150
<4>[ 10.792826] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
<4>[ 10.792828] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x245/0x2b0
<4>[ 10.792833] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef
<4>[ 10.792836] load_module+0x236b/0x2dc0
<4>[ 10.792840] ? show_coresize+0x20/0x20
<4>[ 10.792843] ? vfs_read+0x126/0x150
<4>[ 10.792851] ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
<4>[ 10.792853] SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
<4>[ 10.792862] do_syscall_64+0x65/0x1a0
<4>[ 10.792866] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
<4>[ 10.792868] RIP: 0033:0x7ff6feb0f499
<4>[ 10.792869] RSP: 002b:00007ffdf3058448 EFLAGS: 00000246
ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
<4>[ 10.792872] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005652dfedde90 RCX:
00007ff6feb0f499
<4>[ 10.792874] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ff6ff005e23 RDI:
000000000000000f
<4>[ 10.792875] RBP: 00007ff6ff005e23 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
<4>[ 10.792877] R10: 000000000000000f R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
0000000000000000
<4>[ 10.792878] R13: 00005652dff1c180 R14: 0000000000020000 R15:
000000000aba9500
<4>[ 10.792886] Code: e1 0f 0b 48 c7 c6 a0 df 19 a0 48 c7 c7 39 df
19 a0 e8 e6 aa 00 e1 0f 0b 48 c7 c6 18 c2 1b a0 48 c7 c7 f7 de 19 a0
e8 0c 9f f9 e0 <0f> 0b b8 ea ff ff ff c7 05 97 95 16 00 00 00 00 00 48
83 c4 08
<4>[ 10.792968] ---[ end trace aa9469e091d0e5f0 ]---
So is intel_gvt_active the wrong thing to use, or in fact, is
i915.enable_guc=-1 supposed to handle GVT to start with?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
