On 22/02/2018 10:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
My bad,

perf_pmu.c: In function ‘accuracy’:
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long 
unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]
perf_pmu.c:1533:4: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long 
unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Wformat]

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  tests/perf_pmu.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index b9c4dd58..3bbb18d2 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 
*e,
                        idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
-                       igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: 
%lu%%)\n",
+                       igt_info("%u: busy %"PRIu64"us, idle %"PRIu64"us: %.2f%% 
(target: %lu%%)\n",
                                 pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
                                 100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
                        write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));


Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to