On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:27:51 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-02-20 22:57:10)
Since commit 6ca9a2beb54a ("drm/i915: Unwind i915_gem_init() failure")
we believed that we correctly handle all errors encountered during
GuC initialization, including special one that indicates request to
run driver with disabled GPU submission (-EIO).

Unfortunately since commit 121981fafe69 ("drm/i915/guc: Combine
enable_guc_loading|submission modparams") we stopped using that
error code to avoid unwanted fallback to execlist submission mode.

In result any GuC initialization failure was treated as non-recoverable
error leading to driver load abort, so we could not even read related
GuC error log to investigate cause of the problem.

Fix that by always returning -EIO on uC hardware related failure.

v2: don't allow -EIO from uc_init
    don't call uc_fini[_misc] on -EIO
    mark guc fw as failed on hw init failure
    prepare uc_fini_hw to run after earlier -EIO

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>

Whilst thinking about this, do you want to disable (or rather prevent
setup of) guc submission if the driver is already wedged?

We setup GuC submission in intel_uc_init_hw() and just before we call
it from i915_gem_init_hw() we already have a check for wedged driver.
So maybe we don't want to add redundant guard ?

/Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to