From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Trying to add enum values to non-enum/bitmask properties is a
programmer mistake. WARN to make sure the developers notice
their mistake.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
index d77b0c4dc485..e676b1ecc705 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_property.c
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ int drm_property_add_enum(struct drm_property *property, 
int index,
        if (WARN_ON(strlen(name) >= DRM_PROP_NAME_LEN))
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       if (!(drm_property_type_is(property, DRM_MODE_PROP_ENUM) ||
-                       drm_property_type_is(property, DRM_MODE_PROP_BITMASK)))
+       if (WARN_ON(!drm_property_type_is(property, DRM_MODE_PROP_ENUM) &&
+                   !drm_property_type_is(property, DRM_MODE_PROP_BITMASK)))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        /*
-- 
2.16.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to