We're seeing "RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access" warning
otherwise. And since IRQ are synced for runtime suspend, we can use the
variant without wakeref assert.

Reported-by: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofst...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index 8f93f5bef8fd..6787a3116783 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -391,9 +391,9 @@ void intel_guc_to_host_event_handler(struct intel_guc *guc)
         * clears out the bit on handling the 1st interrupt.
         */
        spin_lock(&guc->irq_lock);
-       val = I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15));
+       val = I915_READ_FW(SOFT_SCRATCH(15));
        msg = val & guc->msg_enabled_mask;
-       I915_WRITE(SOFT_SCRATCH(15), val & ~msg);
+       I915_WRITE_FW(SOFT_SCRATCH(15), val & ~msg);
        spin_unlock(&guc->irq_lock);
 
        if (msg & (INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER |
-- 
2.14.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to