On 4/27/2018 7:24 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:44:53PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not be given, if aspect-ratio
is not supported by the user.
This patch:
1. rejects the modes with aspect-ratio info, during modeset, if the
user does not support aspect ratio.
2. does not load the aspect-ratio info in user-mode structure, if
aspect ratio is not supported.
3. adds helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is expected
in user-mode and for allowing/disallowing the aspect-ratio, if its
not expected.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
V3: Addressed review comments from Ville:
Do not corrupt the current crtc state by updating aspect-ratio on
the fly.
V4: rebase
V5: As suggested by Ville, rejected the modeset calls for modes with
aspect ratio, if the user does not set aspect-ratio cap.
V6: Used the helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is
expected in the user-mode.
V7: rebase
V8: rebase
V9: rebase
v10: Modified the commit-message
v11: rebase
v12: Merged the patch for adding aspect-ratio helper functions
with this patch.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_modes.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
index a231dd5..98323f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev,
crtc_resp->mode_valid = 0;
}
}
+ drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(file_priv, &crtc_resp->mode);
drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex);
return 0;
@@ -628,6 +629,13 @@ int drm_mode_setcrtc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
+ if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv,
+ &crtc_req->mode)) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unexpected aspect-ratio flag bits\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
ret = drm_mode_convert_umode(dev, mode, &crtc_req->mode);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
index c395a24..d6f68c8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
@@ -1759,3 +1759,48 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info
*display,
drm_mode_is_420_also(display, mode);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_is_420);
+
+/**
+ * drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed - checks if the aspect-ratio information
+ * is expected from the user-mode.
+ *
+ * If the user has set aspect-ratio cap, then the flag of the user-mode is
+ * allowed to contain aspect-ratio value.
+ * If the user does not set aspect-ratio cap, then the only value allowed in
the
+ * flags bits is aspect-ratio NONE.
+ *
+ * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities
+ * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flag carry the aspect ratio
+ * information.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * true if the aspect-ratio info is allowed in the user-mode flags.
+ * false, otherwise.
+ */
+bool
+drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode)
+{
+ return file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed || (umode->flags &
+ DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) == DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE;
Still looks funny.
Alright. Let me change it to:
if (file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed ||
(umode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) ==
DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE)
return true;
return false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags - filters the aspect-ratio bits in the
+ * user-mode flags.
+ *
+ * Checks if the aspect-ratio information is allowed. Resets the aspect-ratio
+ * bits in the user-mode flags, if aspect-ratio info is not allowed.
+ *
+ * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities.
+ * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flags' aspect-ratio bits needs to
+ * be filtered.
+ *
+ */
+void
+drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode)
+{
+ if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv, umode))
+ umode->flags &= ~DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK;
+}
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
index 2f78b7e..e0b060d 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
@@ -461,6 +461,10 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420_also(const struct drm_display_info
*display,
const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info *display,
const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
+bool drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode);
+void drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv,
+ struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode);
Since these are no longer exported the prototypes should go into
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h
Got it, will move the prototypes to the correct place.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Regards,
Ankit
struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device *dev,
int hdisplay, int vdisplay, int vrefresh,
--
2.7.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
