Arg, I'm pretty sure I've run into that same issue before.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]>
On 04/06/18 19:17, Michel Thierry wrote:
Use the correct engine class shift value while storing the ctx hw id.
Fixes the copy+paste error from commit 61d5676b5561 ("drm/i915/perf: fix
ctx_id read with GuC & ICL").
Apologies for not spotting this in the original review, the
specific_ctx_id_mask is correct, only the specific_ctx_id had this
problem.
Fixes: 61d5676b5561d6 ("drm/i915/perf: fix ctx_id read with GuC & ICL")
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <[email protected]>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index a6c8d61add0c..c15c7b0fb482 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ static int oa_get_render_ctx_id(struct i915_perf_stream
*stream)
i915->perf.oa.specific_ctx_id =
stream->ctx->hw_id << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32) |
engine->instance << (GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT - 32) |
- engine->class << (GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT - 32);
+ engine->class << (GEN11_ENGINE_CLASS_SHIFT - 32);
i915->perf.oa.specific_ctx_id_mask =
((1U << GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_WIDTH) - 1) <<
(GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32) |
((1U << GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_WIDTH) - 1) <<
(GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT - 32) |
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
