> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:51 PM
> To: Chauhan, Madhav <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Nikula, Jani <[email protected]>;
> Zanoni, Paulo R <[email protected]>; Vivi, Rodrigo
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/13] drm/i915/icl: Program
> TA_TIMING_PARAM registers
> 
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:10:10PM +0530, Madhav Chauhan wrote:
> > This patch programs D-PHY timing parameters for the bus turn around
> > flow(in escape clocks) only if dsi link frequency <=800 MHz using
> > DPHY_TA_TIMING_PARAM and its identical register
> DSI_TA_TIMING_PARAM
> > (inside DSI Controller within the Display Core).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/icl_dsi.c       | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h     |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/icl_dsi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/icl_dsi.c index 832772d..8fd5284 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/icl_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/icl_dsi.c
> > @@ -302,6 +302,27 @@ static void gen11_dsi_setup_dphy_timings(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder)
> >             I915_WRITE(DSI_DATA_TIMING_PARAM(port),
> >                        intel_dsi->dphy_data_lane_reg);
> >     }
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * If DSI link operating at or below an 800 MHz,
> > +    * TA_SURE should be override and programmed to
> > +    * a value '0' inside TA_PARAM_REGISTERS otherwise
> > +    * leave all fields at HW default values.
> > +    */
> > +   if (intel_dsi->bitrate_khz <= KHz(800)) {
> 
> The KHz(800) confuses me. My brain thinks this value is 800 kHz when it's
> not. So I'd write it without the KHz() macro.

Ok. Initially I wrote without using KHz macro, but got comment to use KHz macro 
:)

Regards,
Madhav

> 
> > +           for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> > +                   tmp = I915_READ(DPHY_TA_TIMING_PARAM(port));
> > +                   tmp &= ~TA_SURE_TIME_MASK;
> > +                   tmp |= (TA_SURE_OVERRIDE | TA_SURE_TIME(0));
> > +                   I915_WRITE(DPHY_TA_TIMING_PARAM(port), tmp);
> > +
> > +                   /* shadow register inside display core */
> > +                   tmp = I915_READ(DSI_TA_TIMING_PARAM(port));
> > +                   tmp &= ~TA_SURE_TIME_MASK;
> > +                   tmp |= (TA_SURE_OVERRIDE | TA_SURE_TIME(0));
> > +                   I915_WRITE(DSI_TA_TIMING_PARAM(port), tmp);
> > +           }
> > +   }
> >  }
> >
> >  static void gen11_dsi_enable_port_and_phy(struct intel_encoder
> > *encoder) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > index 9fd8526..25e7396 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
> > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct intel_dsi {
> >
> >     u16 init_count;
> >     u32 pclk;
> > +   u32 bitrate_khz;
> >     u16 burst_mode_ratio;
> >
> >     /* all delays in ms */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> > index 428290d..a9a98a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
> > @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ bool intel_dsi_vbt_init(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
> u16 panel_id)
> >     intel_dsi->pclk = pclk;
> >
> >     bitrate = (pclk * bpp) / intel_dsi->lane_count;
> > +   intel_dsi->bitrate_khz = bitrate;
> >
> >     switch (intel_dsi->escape_clk_div) {
> >     case 0:
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to