On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 07:18:46AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> IPC was only added in SKL+(actually we don't even enable for SKL due
> WA) so without this change, driver was writing to a reserved bit.
> 
> Also removing the uncessary dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false; as now
> gens without IPC will not have IPC enabled.
> 
> v2(Rodrigo):
> - moved the new handling of WA #0477 to the next patch
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 1db9b8328275..e2ca04534e23 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6117,6 +6117,9 @@ void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       u32 val;
>  
> +     if (!HAS_IPC(dev_priv))
> +             return;
> +
>       /* Display WA #0477 WaDisableIPC: skl */
>       if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv))
>               dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
> @@ -6138,7 +6141,6 @@ void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  void intel_init_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -     dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
>       if (!HAS_IPC(dev_priv))
>               return;
>  
> -- 
> 2.19.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to