Em Ter, 2018-10-16 às 22:21 +0000, Patchwork escreveu: > == Series Details == > > Series: More watermarks improvements > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/51086/ > State : warning > > == Summary == > > $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip > 6a8c3f3d3663 drm/i915: don't apply Display WAs 1125 and 1126 to > GLK/CNL+ > 6165f4257098 drm/i915: remove padding from struct skl_wm_level > -:25: CHECK:BOOL_MEMBER: Avoid using bool structure members because > of possible alignment issues - see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/ > 384 > #25: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1248: > + bool plane_en; > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 10 lines checked
That won't save us anything in this specific case, and it's not our usual coding standard. If we conclude i915.ko should go this way, I'd be happy to comply. Maintainers? > 7d4eced125cf drm/i915: fix handling of invisible planes in watermarks > code > -:41: CHECK:BOOL_MEMBER: Avoid using bool structure members because > of possible alignment issues - see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/ > 384 > #41: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1253: > + bool plane_visible; The rest of the struct also uses bools like this. If we go this route, we should probably change the whole struct. > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 52 lines checked > 20ce35c3029a drm/i915: remove useless memset() for watermarks > parameters > 10134ecdb23d drm/i915: simplify wm->is_planar assignment > b6f917785676 drm/i915: refactor skl_write_plane_wm() > -:8: ERROR:GIT_COMMIT_ID: Please use git commit description style > 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit > 9e44b180f81b ("drm/i915: don't write PLANE_BUF_CFG twice every > time")' > #8: > 9e44b180f81b ("drm/i915: don't write PLANE_BUF_CFG twice every time") Well, I used that description style, but it's in the middle of a paragraph so the word "commit" is in the line above. If that's not what you're asking, then I don't know. > > -:16: WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: Non-standard signature: Requested-by: > #16: > Requested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com> Is this really undesirable? > > total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 41 lines checked > 52262264df7e drm/i915: move ddb_blocks to be a watermark parameter > c801352ac21a drm/i915: reorganize the error message for invalid > watermarks > e541090ceec3 drm/i915: make skl_needs_memory_bw_wa() take dev_priv > instead of state > 03f7a31192d8 drm/i915: add pipe_htotal to struct skl_wm_params > 4a4d7716aeaa drm/i915: pass dev_priv instead of cstate to > skl_compute_transition_wm() > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
